http://andymatuschak.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fandymatuschak.org%2Farticles%2F2007%2F11%2F15%2Foops-nevermind%2F&seed_title=Oops%2C+nevermind%21 Flying through the universe of code on a talking spaceship! Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:53:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 http://andymatuschak.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fandymatuschak.org%2Farticles%2F2007%2F11%2F15%2Foops-nevermind%2F&seed_title=Oops%2C+nevermind%21#comment-6457 a person Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:25:22 +0000 http://andymatuschak.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fandymatuschak.org%2Farticles%2F2007%2F11%2F15%2Foops-nevermind%2F&seed_title=Oops%2C+nevermind%21#comment-6457 obvious security reasons? Obviously, an update should be signed by the same people who signed the original version (except that this is hard to get right all the time...). If I wouldn't trust a third-party update to Apple software, why should I trust an update from Apple for third-party software? (of course, maybe "Software Update" means "Apple-software Update", which it does...) obvious security reasons? Obviously, an update should be signed by the same people who signed the original version (except that this is hard to get right all the time…). If I wouldn’t trust a third-party update to Apple software, why should I trust an update from Apple for third-party software? (of course, maybe “Software Update” means “Apple-software Update”, which it does…)

]]> http://andymatuschak.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fandymatuschak.org%2Farticles%2F2007%2F11%2F15%2Foops-nevermind%2F&seed_title=Oops%2C+nevermind%21#comment-4277 livings124 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:52:31 +0000 http://andymatuschak.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fandymatuschak.org%2Farticles%2F2007%2F11%2F15%2Foops-nevermind%2F&seed_title=Oops%2C+nevermind%21#comment-4277 While I applaud the effort, I think what you have now is perfect in terms of interface. Adding a pref pane and all these features feels a little bloaty. I remember reading somewhere, but can't seem to find it now, that the whole point of Sparkle was to give uniform and efficient software update to apps without even revealing the name "Sparkle" to the user...its goal was to be completely invisible from being something separate from the app. The goals of Sparkle 2 seem to be completely opposite from this. While I applaud the effort, I think what you have now is perfect in terms of interface. Adding a pref pane and all these features feels a little bloaty. I remember reading somewhere, but can’t seem to find it now, that the whole point of Sparkle was to give uniform and efficient software update to apps without even revealing the name “Sparkle” to the user…its goal was to be completely invisible from being something separate from the app. The goals of Sparkle 2 seem to be completely opposite from this.

]]>